wrestling / Columns

The Hamilton Ave Journal 07.30.09: Volume 2 – Issue 97

July 30, 2009 | Posted by JP Prag

THE HAMILTON AVE JOURNAL
By JP Prag

Volume 2 – Issue 97

ABOUT THE JOURNAL

The Hamilton Ave Journal is the only wrestling news report focused solely on the business of wrestling. Here in the Journal we not only look at the stories that are important to the investor and business-minded person, but also delve deeper into stories that most fans of wrestling would overlook. That is because the Journal is about getting the heart of the matters that affect the companies and outlooks of the wrestling world.

And where is Hamilton Ave? That is the location of the WWE Production Studio in Stamford, CT, and thus the most powerful place in the wrestling world. Besides, The East Main Street Journal just does not have the right ring to it.

Who am I? I am JP Prag: consultant, entrepreneur, businessman, journalist, and wrestling fan.

Now, ring the bell because the market is open.

The Hamilton Ave Journal

WHAT'S NEWS

The Journal’s front page area known as What’s News isn’t just about telling you what has happened. The stories in this section are about what will have an effect on the wrestling industry, individual federations, and the wallets of the fans.

LEAD STORY: How old is TNA?

Tonight, TNA airs what the and Spike TV are purporting to be the 200th episode of iMPACT. From a joint press release by the two companies:

Spike TV and Total Nonstop Action (TNA) Wrestling will celebrate the 200th episode of TNA “iMPACT!” on Spike TV this Thursday, July 30 at 9:00 PM, ET/PT with its biggest episode in TNA history. Fans should be ready to stay tuned, or set their DVRs, for extra time to make sure they catch all the action as the 200th “iMPACT” will, for the first time, extend beyond its two-hour telecast window (9:00 – 11:04 PM, ET/PT).

TNA iMPACT premiered on Spike TV on Saturday October 1, 2005 at 11pm. In that timeslot, the show was able to garner an average 0.7 ratings. This prompted Spike to move the show to a Thursday 11pm timeslot in April 2006 where ratings moved up to a 0.9 average. It was not long before iMPACT moved to 9pm and the average rating moved up to a 1.0.

This would be the status quo for quite some time. Then, on October 4, 2007 (TNA and Spike’s second anniversary), iMPACT expanded to two hours where they now average a 1.2 rating. During these nearly four years, TNA has gone from getting nothing for the timeslot to getting paid a substantial content fee—not tot mention all of the extra income they receive from distributing iMPACT around the world.

Spike has also been an important partner in upgrading equipment, creating a production process, and even paying for talent. Spike actually put up the half a million dollars for Sting’s contract because they felt that having a big name would sell the product better. While the increase in ratings was negligible, Spike has been able to get better advertising rates by showcasing the named talent in press kits.

Of course, TNA and iMPACT did not always have it so well. Before this stretch of 200 episodes, TNA was airing in a Webcast only from June 2005 until October 2005. This was the only time TNA was completely off television in one form another since their birth in 2002 and the future did not look bright.

Before that, iMPACT aired on Fox Sports Net from May 2004 to May 2005. With their one-hour Friday afternoon timeslot, TNA iMPACT scored an average 0.2 rating. They often faced challenges with local markets where the show can moved around or pre-empted for sporting events. Worse than all that, though, was the fact that TNA was paying for this timeslot and trying to make up the difference in advertising dollars. The show company was deep in the red and not looking like it was going to get into a better position.

Despite this, 64 episodes were shown on FSN and on the WebCasts, brining the total number of episodes of iMPACT to 264 tonight. While some people doubt TNA’s ability to continue functioning for years to come, they are in a much better financial position than where they were five years ago. Being slightly profitable and having a strong broadcasting partner have greatly improved TNA’s position. It would seem that iMPACT surviving the webcasting and FSN eras would indicate that TNA should be able to overcome any of their difficulties.

Newsbites

Some items of note in the rest of the wrestling business world:

  • TNA has also struck a deal with Playboy and will have several of their talents appearing in the magazine. First up is Traci Brooks who has already completed a shoot, while Christy Hemme (who formerly appeared in the magazine) and SoCalVal are rumored to have or will have shoots in the future. Since the WWE went TV-PG, the have essentially cut ties with Playboy, so TNA is looking to take advantage of that gap, the relationship, and the exposure.
  • The WWE was having issues with two major feeds of the Night of Champions PPV feed. The Dish Network HD feed had a one second delay between video and audio while the WWE.com feed was out during the beginning of the show. No word on if any refunds were given, but regular readers of the Journal know that other streams seem more popular that the WWE’s official one.
  • WWE is working to make SummerSlam more like WrestleMania, including holding a fan Axxess. The company is hoping to make SummerSlam a destination event, as well, that cities will bid on. As part of this and other marketing initiatives, they have hired Hollywood agency WME to host parties on behalf the WWE. WME is working to bring in potential new sponsors and partners and work with the WWE’s broadcast partners. Apparently, the whole agency is working on this project.
  • JAKKS Pacific and THQ have reached an agreement concerning the WWE video game license. According to the press release:

    The arbitration award requires THQ to pay JAKKS approximately $34 million on account of the preferred return for the period from July 1, 2006 through March 31, 2009. As a result of the decision, JAKKS will reduce its receivable from THQ from approximately $57 million to approximately $34 million and take a non-cash charge of approximately $22.5 million in the second quarter.

    This was settled rather quickly, so it would seem the companies are quite done with each other for now.

    MARKETPLACE

    In the Marketplace we look at the trends in television ratings. This section is less for critical analysis by the Journal but more for the reader to see what is really going on and to draw their own conclusions.

    As with stocks, here in the Journal we track the progress of television ratings. If ratings are the barometer by which we judge the product, then over the course of 52 weeks we should be able to see patterns, trends, and anomalies.

    For the week ending Wednesday July 29, 2009, here are the current standings of our shows:

    Ratings

    RAW
    Close (This Week’s Rating): 4.0
    Open (Last Week’s Rating): 3.5
    Percentage Change: ▲ 12.9%
    52-Week High: 4.5
    52-Week Low: 2.6
    All Time High: 8.1
    All Time Low: 1.8

    SmackDown*
    Close (This Week’s Rating): 1.8
    Open (Last Week’s Rating): 1.8
    Percentage Change: UNCH
    52-Week High: 2.5
    52-Week Low: 1.6
    All Time High: 5.8
    All Time Low: 1.0

    * SmackDown! ratings may include fast overnight if final ratings are not posted. Also, SmackDown! ratings are for the prior week as overnights are not available before this article goes to print.

    ECW
    Close (This Week’s Rating): 1.3
    Open (Last Week’s Rating): 1.2
    Percentage Change: ▲ 8.3%
    52-Week High: 1.5
    52-Week Low: 0.7
    All Time High: 2.3
    All Time Low: 0.6

    TNA iMPACT**
    Close (This Week’s Rating): 1.3
    Open (Last Week’s Rating): 1.1
    Percentage Change: ▲ 18.2%
    52-Week High: 1.3
    52-Week Low: 0.9
    All Time High: 1.3
    All Time Low: 0.6

    ** TNA iMPACT’s are for the prior week as ratings may not be available at the time of the Journal’s posting

    SuperStars***
    Close (This Week’s Rating): 0.9
    Open (Last Week’s Rating): 0.9
    Percentage Change: UNCH
    52-Week High: 1.0
    52-Week Low: 0.8
    All Time High: 1.0
    All Time Low: 0.8

    *** SuperStars ratings may include fast overnight if final ratings are not posted. Also, SuperStars ratings are for the prior week as overnights are not available before this article goes to print.

    Analysis:

    This week was generally a positive one for ratings as every show either remained the same or went up a bit. The big winners were iMPACT—which returned to a 1.3 rating for the first time since April 16, 2009—and RAW. RAW received their highest non-commercial free show since February 23, 2009’s 4.1, coming in with a 3.95. It looks like the WWE had the right guest-host this week to bump the ratings. Of course, they cannot depend on that and having guest host may not equate to ratings, no matter how big that star may be.

    After a while, the concept may grow old and people will not be interested in seeing the guest host in action. After all, “The New Scooby-Doo Movies” only lasted 24 episodes.

    MONEY AND INVESTING

    We all know that wrestling is a business, but we don’t often pay attention to what sells and makes money. Money and Investing looks into the top selling items in the world of wrestling and any interesting figures that may have come out this week.

    What are the top ten selling items for the WWE? From WWEShopZone.com:

    1. Jeff Hardy Deluxe Aggression #21 Action Figure (Item Unavailable)
    2. Randy Orton Root of Evil T-Shirt ($25)
    3. John Cena HLR Academy T-Shirt Package ($57, on sale $29.99)
    4. Triple H Eversoris T-Shirt ($28)
    5. Jeff Hardy 2 Armband Package ($40, on sale $14.99)
    6. Hardys 2008 Spiral Notebook ($5, on sale $3)
    7. John Cena Attitude Adjustment T-Shirt ($25)
    8. Hardys Green Pendant ($10)
    9. Jeff Hardy PPV #20 Action Figure/Armband Package ($43.99, on sale $27.99)
    10. Hardys Messenger Bag ($35, on sale $24.98)

    The list returned to something must more expected this week, though the sales continued to put some odd items in the list. Those items did still belong to regulars Jeff Hardy and John Cena, so there was not too much deviation in this list. On the other end, Randy Orton returned to the list with a new shirt. Can he keep up between the high profile sales of John Cena, Jeff Hardy, and Triple H? Prior history indicates that he cannot maintain the position for long.

    TNA sometimes releases a list of top selling items on ShopTNA.com. According to the site the top selling items were:

    1. July Holiday Sale – Mix package ($250, on sale $49.99)
    2. Destination X 2009 DVD ($14.99, on sale $11.99)
    3. Beer Money T-shirt ($19.99)
    4. Against All Odds 2009 PPV DVD ($14.99, on sale $9.99)
    5. Lockdown – 2009 DVD ($19.99)
    6. Taz FTW shirt ($19.99)
    7. The Beautiful People Men’s T-shirt ($19.99)
    8. Kurt Angle – Champion DVD ($19.99, on sale $17.99)

    9. Cross The Line Triple Pack 2.0 DVD Set ($24.99, on sale $14.99)
    10. TNA Logo T-shirt Special ($24.99)

    TNA continued their streak of updates with some shuffling this week. Most interesting was the introduction of the Taz FTW shirt. While hiring a non-wrestler in a prominent role has many people scratching their heads, it would appear that Taz is able to make up his contract in sales right out of the gate. The Beautiful People also shows that they can sell a men’s shirt and not just women’s clothing and trading cards, thus expanding their repertoire.

    Conspicuous by his absence this week is Jeff Jarrett. Mr. Jarrett has been on this list since his DVD premiered, so his absence is either showing the saturation of the product, a condition of him not being on TV, or a conscious decision by TNA to not have his product appear due to his current situation. Considering TNA has listed Christian Cage several times since he left the company, the latter seems highly unlikely.

    PERSONAL JOURNAL

    Wrestling isn’t just about watching and reading. The best way to be a wrestling fan is to experience it live. Where is wrestling coming to in the next 2 weeks? The Personal Journal answers that question.

    Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
    2 (Aug)

  • RAW Live (White Plains, NY)
  • SmackDown / ECW Live (Verona, NY)
  • SmackDown / ECW Live (Hyannis, MA)
  • 3

  • RAW (Mohegan Sun, CT)
  • SmackDown / ECW Live (Reading, PA)
  • 4

  • SmackDown / ECW (Long Island, NY)
  • 5 6 7

  • RAW Live (Denver, CO)
  • TNA Live (Biloxi, MS)
  • 8

  • RAW Live (Loveland, CO)
  • SmackDown / ECW Live (Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • TNA Live (Baton Rouge, LA)
  • 9

  • RAW Live (Colorado Springs, CO)
  • SmackDown / ECW Live (Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada)
  • TNA Live (Alexandria, LA)
  • 10

  • RAW (Calgary, Alberta, Canada)
  • SmackDown / ECW Live (Red Deer, Alberta, Canada)
  • 11

  • SmackDown / ECW (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)
  • 12 13 14

  • RAW Live (Cedar Rapids, IA)
  • ROH on HDNet (Philadelphia, PA)
  • 15

  • RAW Live (Peoria, IL)
  • SmackDown / ECW Live (Mankato, MN)
  • ROH on HDNet (Philadelphia, PA)
  • Do you know a wrestling event coming up? Send one in to The Hamilton Ave Journal and we’ll be sure to add it to the list.

    EDITORIALS

    The Editorials section is designed for you, the readers, to respond to the views presented in the Journal, send an important news item, or talk about another overlooked business related item in wrestling. Just beware: the Journal reserves the right to respond back.

    From the commentary section last week, there was some misunderstanding of when Jeff Jarrett has not been actively involved in TNA. Donners asked:

    Did Jarrett not take time off around his wife’s death? He certainly wasn’t on screen, but I would have presumed he would also not have been backstage.

    And Rinsa decided to take it two steps further:

    As Donners says above, JJ did take time off when his wife died.

    So, wrong again.

    As I’ve said before I like the column, but basic glaring errors like this, which seem to be getting all the more frequent, really damage it.

    Actually, Rinsa, you are wrong again. Jarrett stayed actively involved with the company when he was not on TV, especially in an office capacity. He lives in Nashville right near the office and most accounts say that he preferred to keep busy rather then spend time thinking about his wife’s passing. Jarrett missed a couple of TV tapings, but that was about it. He was back in Orlando in very short order and stayed involved with the writing team even when he was away.

    So perhaps what you view as “glaring error” are actually holes in your information?

    Moving on from Jeff Jarrett, this situation involving his is most interesting. Lexie asks several questions:

    If Jeff Leaves TNA, Will Kurt Angle become the chief booker or will it be Vince Russo?

    That is completely up to Dixie Carter. As President of TNA, she has final say on who is writing the shows. Up until this point, she has been quite content to run the business side and let Mr. Jarrett run the creative side. If Mr. Jarrett cannot continue in that role, Ms. Carter will appoint someone else.

    How much Of TNA is owned By Jeff, How much by Dixie Carter? And are there more owners?

    Ms. Carter owns 0% of the company. TNA’s parent company Panda Energy took 72% of the company when they invested in 2002. Since Ms. Carter’s parents are the owners of Panda Energy, she is the defacto owner. In reality, though, she is just the president.

    Given that purchase amount and assuming Mr. Jarrett bought out his father, he owns 28% of the company. It is conceivable that Spike TV or Viacom own a piece of TNA, but for the most part Panda Energy is the majority owner.

    If Kurt Angle is the one who leaves, will it have a slight impact or will it hurt TNA a lot?

    Kurt cannot leave tomorrow as he has plenty of time on his contract, but if he were to leave at that point the impact would be minimal. Kurt Angle personally did not add significant buyrates, ratings, or attendance figures. He does move a significant amount of merchandise, but most of TNA’s big selling items in the past 2 years have been from compilation items. TNA has more than enough talent to fill the void left if Mr. Angle were to leave. Much like the WWE, no one star determines the fate of the company. Instead, it is the production of the show in total that determines that.

    In other words, who is more important for TNA – KURT OR JEFF? The person who founded them or their biggest star?

    To TNA the corporation, neither is that important. They are valued members of the staff that both add different aspects to the product and company, but neither is irreplaceable. There are plenty of wrestlers, writers, sales people, pitch men, faces of the company, and whatever other roles are needed out there. From a corporate perspective, if both were to leave tomorrow there would be a bit of short term pain, but in the end the company would continue on and fill the void.

    One more Q –

    After most people denounced Victory Road as a meaningless Filler PPV, do you think TNA needs to reduce the number of PPV’s and go for quality instead of quantity?

    Or do they need lots of PPV’s to survive?

    In other words, is it economically feasible for TNA to reduce their PPV’s by a significant number and to make them feel more important than just filler?

    Unlike the WWE, TNA is not highly dependent on PPV revenue. Of the $50 million in estimated revenue last year, $4.5 million (after the PPV companies’ 50% cut) came from PPV buys. This amounts to 9% of TNA’s top line. There is no proof for TNA that reducing the number of PPVs will lead to more buyrates as most buyrates do not go into very high numbers (Average buyrates of 25,000). Could TNA get better buyrates from fewer PPVs? This seems highly unlikely as they have not been able to increase their conversion rate in three years. Instead, as ratings have risen their conversion rate has actually decreased! Before TNA can even consider reducing the number of PPVs they have, they first have to get conversion rates to at least be going in an upward trend.

    Speaking of PPVs, mogamer: wants to know a bit more about WWE PPVs:

    WWE couldn’t get as many buys with 4 PPV’s like they do now with 14. But I do think that they could by cutting back to 8. And they might actually have a larger net profit by avoiding the production costs of 6 extra PPV’s.

    Ok, we start off with the same assumption. The Big 4 PPVs bring in 2 million buys and about $106 million, leaving a gap of $2.4 million dollars. Assuming no change to the Big 4, at $34.95, the remaining four PPVs would have to do an average buyrate of over 590,000, higher than other PPV except WrestleMania. If the price were raised to $44.95, each PPV would need nearly 460,000 buys, still higher than every other PPV except WrestleMania and SummerSlam.

    Now, let’s say that the Big 4 all increase in buyrates by an astounding number like 20%. Even with that, the other PPVs at the $44.95 price point would have to do well over 333,000 buys a piece. That would be nearly as much as Survivor Series last year and close to Survivor Series after the 20% increase.

    You can see from this, then, that even the eight PPV model would be stretch for the WWE and audience. The WWE is still better off with lower buyrates across 14 PPVs then trying to get such an increase with fewer PPVs. More PPVs spreads the risk, and the WWE has that risk spread.

    Still, ODog finds fault with this model:

    Love the column but find fault with your PPV analysis. Basically, each show would need to get about 1 million buys. The WWE has proven with their WrestleMania promotion that they can get 1 million people to buy that show based on name alone. If they went back to only 4 PPVs, increased them to 4-hours, they could charge $60 per show easy.

    All they would have to do is convince their WrestleMania core audience that there are now 4 WrestleManias and they must buy them. It would also give the WWE leverage to do real NBC specials, pseudo-PPVs, that could open up another stream of revenue if those shows draw well with real PPV matches.

    Personally, I think 6 is a more reasonable number. It would give them 2 months between shows, the opportunity to have PPV-quality shows for either Raw to pop a number or NBC or another TV partner.

    You forget one thing: the core audience isn’t the WrestleMania audience. There are a large number of people who buy WrestleMania around the world who do not watch another wrestling event all year. Those people have been conditioned for WrestleMania over 25 years of work. To convince them that Survivor Series is worth their money would be a major stretch. At the same time, Royal Rumble would be the biggest problem because it is so close to WrestleMania. Are one million people going to buy the Royal Rumble and then WrestleMania just eight to ten weeks later? That does not seem like something that is likely to happen.

    Plenty more was written, so be sure to take a look. And if you enjoy the Journal, why not bookmark 411wrestling.com and make it your home page? You can do that by clicking here.

    CLOSING BELL

    This concludes Issue #97 (Volume 2) of THE HAMILTON AVE JOURNAL. Join us next week as we get ready to ring the bell again.

    Till then!

  • NULL

    article topics

    JP Prag

    Comments are closed.