wrestling / Columns

Ask 411 Wrestling 10.05.11: Safety First, Last Arm Drops, Ultra Violence, More!

October 5, 2011 | Posted by Mathew Sforcina

Hey, this is Ask 411 Wrestling, I am Mathew Sforcina, and after a very hectic and somewhat impactful long weekend (long story, you’re not interested, I’m not telling) I’m attempting to get back into the groove with this and everything else. So forgive me if this ends up disjointed or odd or wrong in some way or another.

Here’s some plugs for you. Tom Tom Club! 411mania’s podcasts! Wrestling PodClash!

And here’s a banner!

411 on Twitter!

Me On Twitter~!
Take a look at the #heellogic hashtag. Hopefully it’s entertaining and/or amusing…
http://www.twitter.com/411mania
http://www.twitter.com/411wrestling
http://www.twitter.com/411moviestv
http://www.twitter.com/411music
http://www.twitter.com/411games
http://www.twitter.com/411mma

Backtalking

World Titles: I appreciate that others may disagree with my stance on world titles. I also said that last week. So thank you for the feedback, but my position has not changed, nor should you.

Owen Hart: … Without getting into an argument over this, Owen Hart died in an accident that was a direct consequence of actions undertaken by the WWF as part of their employment of him. That is, in my mind, the very definition of something not turning out in a positive fashion. But if you were offended, I’m sorry you feel that way.

Dominate/Dominant: See, now, unlike my usage of ‘hence/thus/therefore’ (which is perfectly justified in the English language) this is a genuine mistake that I keep making because I’m hazy at times with spelling and spellcheck is not perfect. And for that, I apologize. I will endeavour to not make the mistake in future, but frankly, if you go back over my past work, my track record is not superb when it comes to mistypings that are actual words. Huh, maybe writing these things into the night’s not a superb idea…

Your Turn, Smart Guy…

Who am I? Andre The Giant’s birthplace is none of my business. My name was given to me by the ring announcer of my first match. I was once called a Machine. I once lived in Melbourne, Australia. I once claimed to be somewhat of an artist. I won a title 37 years after debuting in the industry. And I’ve done something that only Sgt. Slaughter had done before me. Who am I?

Azrael81 is pretty much on the money.

You are “Rowdy” Roddy Piper.

Andre The Giant’s birthplace is none of my business. – …like anywhere bar where “The Rowdy One” was was “his business”.

My name was given to me by the ring announcer of my first match. – His first match was against Larry “The Axe” Hennig, father of “Mr. Perfect” Curt Hennig and grandfather of Joe Hennig, aka Michael McGillicutty. He got the nickname “Rowdy” by displaying his trademark “Scottish” rage, his spontaneity and his quick wits.

I was once called a Machine. – The Piper Machine

I once lived in Melbourne, Australia, and I once claimed to be somewhat of an artist. – more than plausible.

I won a title 37 years after debuting in the industry. – Won WWE World Tag Team Championship (w/ Ric Flair) vs. The Spirit Squad (Cyber Sunday, 11/05/06)

I’ve done something that only Sgt. Slaughter had done before me. – In 2007, Piper became the second pro-wrestler (after Sgt. Slaughter) to have their likeness crafted in a G.I. Joe figure. According to his filecard, he is a trainer for Destro’s Iron Grenadiers.

See, I’ve been watching the Piper DVD set a lot the past week, so it’s based on that really. As pointed out by others, The birthplace thing was in a Piper’s Pit with Andre, while the artist was with Piper’s Pit with Mr. T.

Who am I? I used to have a “Two Initials-Last Name” ring name style. My sole singles title in the United States lasted a respectable 175 days, while my tag title reign in the same company didn’t last one day. I was once burned in a fireball spot gone wrong. I once teamed with Matt Hardy. A Slammy winner, I am who?

Questions, Questions, Who’s Got The Questions?

Bobby starts us off with Bret V Lex.

Last week, you talked about how “Luger failed to get the required momentum leading up to Summerslam” and how the “Luger experiment failed”. My question is, why was his main event push deemed a failure? Summerslam 93 drew a respectable buyrate and I remember the live audiences reacting favorably to Luger (though obviously not to the same extent as with Hogan). The WWF pushed Bret in favor of Luger and ratings and buyrates continued their free fall. Why isn’t Bret’s push considered a failure?

There’s a few reasons. For starters, Bret’s push isn’t exactly held as the pinnacle of face push achievement, to be fair. Yes, it’s not nearly as reviled as the Lex Express Tour, but it’s not considered a success. Now, Bret was, at least, popular in Canada and had a decent following overseas, so he always had that to fall back on, whereas Luger wasn’t a huge success anywhere. Scuttlebutt indicates that live events had somewhat lukewarm reactions to him and the Lex Express. And also Bret won, a liberty Luger was not given (look, as much as I wouldn’t have liked it, they should have had Luger win the title at Summerslam. Change it back at Survivor Series if it doesn’t work.)

However, the major reason is an economy of scale. Bret’s push was extensive, but over a long time. At no point was Bret Hart pushed as Hogan 2.0, as a All American Super Mega Face. He was just Bret Hart, Damn Fine Wrestler. Luger was given the almighty God push leading into Summerslam, hence why he should have won. But Luger got pushed hard and very fast, very quickly. So, since it didn’t work in making him as over as Hogan, it’s a failure because they pushed him too hard. Had he been pushed as Lex Luger, A Guy Who Realised He Didn’t Want To Be Evil, or some other gimmick that wasn’t so blatantly Hogan 2.0, it might be better received.

Pat continues the topic.

Hey

Great job each week. I was wondering about Wrestlemania 9 and 10. So I’ve always heard WM9 was supposed to be Bret’s big WM moment, but that got derailed due to Hogan wanting to have his time in the spotlight, so they went with the plan of Yoko winning and Hogan challenging him to an impromptu match for the title.

Then I heard that WMX was Bret’s night, as a sort of thank you for having dealt with getting screwed for having to give up his spotlight the previous year. But then I also heard that Lex was planned to win the title WMX up until the night before WMX, and he got drunk and publicly spoiled WWE’s plans, so they nixed that and gave it to Bret.

But these seem contradictory.. so which is it?

Neither.

Bret was never going to leave WMIX as champ, once they set things in motion with Yokozuna. Supposedly, like WMIV before it, the plan was for Bret to wrestle Yokozuna, Yokozuna cheats, Yokozuna wins, goodnight everybody!

That’s it. Hogan then comes in and says (rightly, to some degree) that WM should end with the face going over, and then suggests that after Yoko wins, he comes out, they have a 6-8 minute match, he wins. They go with that plan, and then thanks to time constraints Hogan wins in under a minute, practically.

Skip ahead to WMX. And Bret winning was again always the plan. This story that Luger was set to win the title and blabbed it to reporters the night before is 100% fake. You can go back and look at the newspapers from the time and none of them have anything about Luger saying he was gonna win.

And besides, if that had happened, why would that be news? I mean, all WWF would have to say is “Luger’s being confident, he is confident of beating Yokozuna”. I say I’m going to win every single match ever, even ones I’m not in. Doesn’t mean it’s true.

Stuart asks about Kurt Angle.

Hey, great column,

I haven’t watched wrestling for a long time for one reason or another, but recently turned over to Impact Wrestling last night and I have to ask, what the hell happened to Kurt Angle!? The guy is so thin and drawn he looks anorexic; I seriously did not recognise him at all, he looked and sounded so different to to last time I saw him. has Kurt been favouring cardio workouts or been ill, because the guy needa a good steak and eggs meal to bulk up a bit!

Thanks!!

Kurt Angle, for all the jokes and insults, seems to legitimately be training for the 2012 Summer Olympics. And for that, he needs to slim down, so that he has more flexibility, cardio and speed, or some sort of other benefit to Amateur wrestling I don’t know because I don’t know anything about it. But yeah, he’s slimming down because he is actually going to try for the Olympics.

Well, time to bite the bullet and get this over with. Doug has been waiting a long time for this, and since I’m never going to find the sources I need…

I recently watched the rf video shoot with Eric Embry. He told a story I’d never heard before: How WCCW became the USWA. After Jerry Jarrett bought the Dallas territory from Fritz Von Erich, Embry booked an angle where Taras Bulba used the claw on Kerry Von Erich and he was carried out on a stretcher. Well, Fritz was so pissed that he calls Jarrett and says that he could no longer use the World Class name. Apparently, Jarrett didn’t get the name included in the deal so WCCW became the USWA with Memphis.

I’ve always been curious about the whole AWA/WCCW/USWA working relationship in 1988 and after Jarrett bought WCCW.

Specifically, I always wondered why Jerry Jarrett didn’t better utilize what seemed to be an expansion plan. When you take into account his future work at WWE, flirtation with WCW, and then founding TNA, he clearly had aspirations of running a national promotion. Why else would he have bought the Dallas territory, since he didn’t buy the name WCCW or the tape library?

Did he ever make an attempt to buy out Verne Gagne? Do you think the failure to buy or continue working with the AWA ultimately curtailed a plan to go national? Why do you think he didn’t to better utilize the ESPN time slot and do an invasion angle or even integrate more Memphis footage? Why did they ultimately lose that spot to the GWF?

Thanks,

Firstly, I don’t really buy that explanation of the name change, but I can’t prove it, so I’ll let it slide.

Second, yes I believe Jarrett was attempting to do what McMahon had offered to do and what Jim Crockett had done, expand by buying out territories. His purchases and attempted purchases do paint the picture of a guy who wants to run a national promotion. And more power to him, he did, kinda, for a little while in TNA, and he is one of those names that might have ended up running the WWF had Vince gone to jail. Clearly he has some idea of how to run/book a wrestling promotion, so why not do so on a major scale?

Now, supposedly yes, Jarrett did actually offer to buy out the AWA after Verne got into hot water. Verne’s money was coming from loans on a waterfront property that eventually was taken from him by eminent domain. So with that source of income gone, he ended up desperate to sell. He did contact Jarrett, and a deal was almost reached until, of all things, Verne’s insistence that Jerry push his son Greg Gagne as a top contender was the sticking point, and the issue that led to the deal falling through.

I don’t think not buying AWA led to him not going national, but it played a part. There was just too many obstacles in the way, with both Vince and Crockett in the way, there was only so far you could get, and without the AWA as a boost, it became that much harder to get there, and it didn’t end up seeming worth the slog for the off chance.

As for the timeslot, that comes down to the booking, specifically Eric Embry. Eric’s booking is actually somewhat ahead of his time, as you look back at the angles that got him into trouble with TV channels, a female valet getting superkicked by a man and taken out on a stretcher, Eric himself throwing up in the ring after a baseball attack, neither of those would cause eyelids to be batted in Attitude but at the time got USWA in huge hot water. And Invasion wasn’t on the cards since they wanted to merge the fanbases, not pit them against each other.

As for how ESPN went from USWA to GWF, that I can’t seem to find evidence on. I could guess that it was simply a case of GWF undercutting USWA, offering more content for less money, but I can’t give you an answer with any certainty. Perhaps a reader might know, but sadly my Google Fu has failed me somewhat here.

Simon wants to talk Shawn Michaels.

Hello,

I have a couple of questions about Shawn Michaels. I will write them as mini questions to save you answering one massive questions.

1. I remember the great super kick in the barber shop to break up the Rockers. My first question is did Shawn go straight into the HBK gimmick the night after the Rockers break up? If not what did he wear and how did he act and when did he turn into HBK? Did Sherri manage him from day one.

Any information or videos on this would be great. I can only remember Shawn at the high flying Rocker and then the full blown HBK with Sherri.

Shawn’s first match after the break up was 2 days later in Pensacola Florida, where he was in a tag match against The Nasty Boys when he teamed with… Marty Jannetty.

See, although the break up was filmed at the beginning of December 1991, it wasn’t shown until January 1992. His first televised appearance and first wrestling appearance post showing of the attack was the 1992 Royal Rumble.

Now that’s not full blown HBK Shawn Michaels, sure, but it’s pretty close. His next match was about a week later, and in that match, Sherri was managing him. So prettyu much yes, he went straight from Rocker to HBK, albeit HBK Beta 0.8.

2. Why did they never run with the Michaels – Jannetty fued on a big scale? i know Marty kept getting fired but why did they not make a bigger deal of the fued when he was employed?

You kinda answered your own question there. I’m sure they wanted to make a big deal of it, but he kept getting fired. 6 days after the 92 Royal Rumble, to quote HistoryofWWE.com…

– 1/25/92: Marty Jannetty was arrested at 2 a.m. following an altercation outside a Tampa, FL nightclub with police. Jannetty’s female companion, Angela Ialacci, 19, was arrested by police after trying to use a fake ID, at which time Jannetty reportedly grabbed the cop. They were found to be in possession of less than a gram of cocaine. Jannetty was charged with possession of cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting arrest with force. Jannetty was indefinitely suspended by the WWF.

He came back in October, leading to a match at Royal Rumble 1993, which didn’t go well, and then he got fired the next night after being found passed out in the back of the San Jose State Event Center. True, WWF was running there, but still.

So the first two times he pretty much only feuded with Shawn Michaels, and it only ended when he got fired. True, his third run saw him win the IC title, but he lost it back fairly quickly and then was moved down. But by then, he’d burnt the WWF twice, so why risk pushing him as a major star if he had already blown two chances?

3. Why did he keep going over so weak? I remember he won by count out against Tatanka at WM9 (i know Tatanka was undefeated) but why not go over clean in the biggest event of all. The same thing happened in the Summerslam at Wembley.

Thanks

Because he was a slimy arrogant small heel. Slimy arrogant small heels don’t get clean wins, they cheat, they lie, they escape with their titles intact because they cheat outrageously. Nothing against him personally, just that he wasn’t being booked as a all crushing monster heel, more a small, vain one.

Shio wants to head to Japan.

Hey Mat, always with the most informative columns on the site.

Why did Jushin Thunder Liger never win the IWGP title in NJPW? He’s a cruiserweight legend in Japan, the NJPW equivalent of WWE’s Rey Mysterio, minus the World title runs. He was on par with Mutoh, Hashimoto, and Chono during the 90s when he could have plausibly won the title, and even after all those guys stopped performing at a high level, Liger could still go. Like Rey Mysterio in North America, he’s shown that his influence transcends his small stature, and he could Main Event without it seeming out of place, so why do they never consider putting the title on the guy?

Keep Being Awesome,

Stand back Byers, I got this.

I hope.

It’s a matter of timing and Japanese wrestling culture. For the years where he was dominating (there’s that word again) the Junior Heavyweight (Cruiserweight/Light Heavyweight/Small Guys Who Aren’t Midgets) division, that was seen to be on par with the Heavyweights, Liger holding the IWGP Junior Heavyweight Title was just as prestigious as him holding the Heavyweight title. So there was no point moving over when he could get the same respect holding another title and wrestling guys better attended to his then wrestling style.

The closest he got was in 2000, when the then booker, Riki Chōshū, started to pull back the Juniors, Liger began to try his hand in the Heavyweight division and, really, probably should have won it at least once. But given that the division as a whole was being depushed, it just wasn’t on the cards for him to get that kind of push.

Now, of course, he’s wrestling, so it’s possible, but it seems that when he could really go they kept him with the other guys who could work well with him, and now that he’s maybe lost a step or two, he’s not looking to work with the bigger guys.

But I agree that he probably should hold it.

Seems like a while, so let’s have a video dump!

First of all… SHINING WIZADO!!!

This is what Vince McMahon believes.

Well….

ULTRA VIOLENCE!

Wood316 has two related questions.

Hello,
I am sure you have heard it a million time by now but I am a constant reader and love the column.

Still love hearing it.

I have two questions:
My first question is: has there been any incedent or event (aside from pillman/austin) where a gun was used in a storyline or maybe even a match? Has it ever been used in a match or even apeared in a wrestling ring? And do you think that any network would allow a promotion to use a gun in a storyline?

Well, the obvious first answer is yes. Bang 3:16.

Beyond that, none spring to mind. Apart from staple guns, of course. But no, they don’t normally appear in wrestling rings for two main reasons. One, they are rather above the threshold for acceptable violence levels, both in terms of TV and in terms of if you pull a gun in this day and age you’d get shot pretty quick by cops. And two, it stupidly brings the violence level far too high. Just like when Samoa Joe was walking around with a giant machete, if you start having deadly weapons carried around then you’re implying guys want to kill each other. That’s murder, and also it makes guys wrestling over spilt coffee look silly. Well, more so.

Which leads me to my second question: how much control does a network actually have on the program? and i dont just mean time-wise, but the actual storylines, language, and maybe even moves inside the ring

Hope you have time and answer these questions, thank you.

Well in some ways it’s a lot, in others none, unless it’s arranged differently. Basically at the end of the day, if the network doesn’t like the show, they can pull it. So in one way, they have total control over the show, in that they can choose to air it, or not to air it. But specifically, they can have control over some storylines and language and maybe even moves (albeit moves involving weapons, most likely) in that they will be monitoring the show and giving feedback. They aren’t always as hands on as Bonnie Hammer is at times, but in today’s world, a network does have a say in it’s TV shows, and will work with the company to ensure everyone is happy.

But in the end of the day, the wrestling company has the final say in what happens on the show. And the network has the final final say in terms of if anyone sees it.

Ben keeps us backstage.

I have always wondered. These days it’s fairly obvious that wrestler’s have pushed the limits of safety for some time now. Is there a central figure in the WWE, a sort of “safety monitor” that okays or veto’s new spot ideas based on injury risks?

Also, is there anyone, other than the wrestler’s themselves, that helps choreograph a risky spot to minimize injury ( as well as promote “sellability”)?

In both cases, that’s part of the work done by the ‘Producers’. Guys like Dean Malenko, Arn Anderson, Ricky Steamboat and all, they help the young guys, working with them on matches, on spots, and also suggesting and perhaps vetoing moves based on safety. It’s an important job in the current WWE world.

Cyrith wants to ask about rights with regard to slapping.

Matt-
When does it become okay to slap the hell out of a guy in the ring. I’m watching some older Kenta Kobashi stuff(late 80′-90), and he doesn’t seem to lay into it like he does against Samoa Joe in ROH(’04?). At some point he either started hitting harder. When does he go from being a young boy getting beaten on to being the one who beats on everyone?

Like Steve Austin (now there’s a comparison I didn’t think I’d ever make…) Kenta has had to change his style over time due to injuries. But whereas Austin’s problem was his neck, Kenta’s problem has been with his knees. In 2000, when he joined NOAH, his knees were shot to hell, but he kept going out of a need to help NOAH get over. But that led to a long period of time off/injuries and comeback and injuries again. By the time he finished with his knee problems, he had to change his style to one of more and stronger strikes since he wasn’t quite as agile as he once was. And by then he was so respected he got away with it.

Rod wants to talk arm drops.

Hi Mathew,

A bit of a random question, when was the last time, in a major match (tv or ppv), that someone lost by having their arm drop 3 times in a submission hold?? It seems this finnish, or even as a false finnish, is very seldom seen these days? Also what were the biggest instances of this finnish being used? i.e a title match, Hogan/Piper???

Thanks

See, time has ruined this, as the last time it was used it would be the last time Dolph used the Sleeper. I think Kofi at Capitol Punishment.

As for biggest uses, Piper V Hogan was the big one, as a non-title World Title match. Beyond that, Brock got a victory over Hogan as well with it.

And Taz, back in ECW, got some wins with the Tazmission via arm drop, the biggest being Sabu at ECW Barely Legal.

Any big ones I’m missing readers?

My Damn Opinion

Derek wants to talk about a world without bosses.

Hey Matt,

I have a question for you. I do vividly recall back in the early 1990’s that before PPV’s
they’d have Mene Gene basically do a little 5 min newscast every week on Superstars or Wrestling Challenge going over the PPV. Every week they’d add matches and have the wrestlers cut promos.

Fast forward 7 or 8 years and watch Nitro… at the beginning of the broadcast Tony Shavoni would talk about all the matches they have tonight, and talk about matches booked for the PPVs.

Now its almost every match that ever has taken place is set up in the ring with some promo… watch Impact/Raw…20 minute promo to set up the match. It’s not really logical… If you wanted a world title shot… why not just go out in the ring and bitch until you get one. I think this became standard once the “Boss/GM is biased” was proven successful with Bishoff/McMahon. Do you forsee a future where this is not common place? Where the bosses behind the scenes are removed and we let the professional wrestlers tell the stories.

Thanks!

Sadly not. You see, there are always a few guys who can’t wrestle but can talk, be they the boss, or a retired wrestler, or someone who’s injured. And having an authority figure is a cheap, simple way to fill time and gives you lots of stories. Thus, I don’t think it’s ever going to be gotten rid of, now that the genie is out of the bag, to mix my metaphors. I hope I’m wrong (hell, the entire stupid COO angle could be a good way to remove the concept) but the fact is that it’s far too useful as a storytelling device and as a way to keep someone useful, from the wrestling company’s perspective.

Birdman wants to ask about rehearsals.

Mathew:

First, the obligatory “great job/ best column the site/ long-time reader, first-time writer” introductory stuff. Now then…

Periodically on Ask 411, someone will make reference to the fact that Ricky Steamboat doesn’t have the same amount of love for his WrestleMania III match that the rest of the world does, due to the fact that Randy Savage wanted to practice the match beforehand. And I’m pretty sure Ric Flair had a similar critique of his match with Savage at WrestleMania VIII. But my question is this: what’s wrong with practicing a little, especially for the big matches?

The more wrestling-related books I read, the more astounded I am about how little preparation seems to go into matches, even really significant ones. In Heartbreak and Triumph, for example, Shawn Michaels said that he and Razor Ramon only saw each other once pre-match on the day of WrestleMania X (and that was to see how high the crew should hang the belts). And in Hitman, Bret Hart said that he and Steve Austin didn’t talk about their WrestleMania 13 match until the day of the show.

Now, as far as those two matches are concerned, I suppose one could say, “Yeah, they didn’t practice, and so what? They were still incredible.” And yet, I can’t help thinking how many good matches could have been great and how many great matches could have reached “one-of-the-best” status if the participants just practiced a little bit ahead of time.

I get that the ability to “call it in the ring” is the real art of pro-wrestling. On the other hand, if I pay money to see any other kind of live performance– a concert, say, or a play– I like to know that the performers aren’t just winging it out there. So, once again: what’s so wrong with a little practicing once in a while?

Well this is a very interesting topic, and one that might well cause some chaos below, especially given that my answer is based mostly on stuff that the vast majority of readers don’t know.

Let me start by adding to your argument that there are examples of matches that were heavily prepared and rehearsed prior to bell time. Hogan V Warrior at WM6 is the classic example. And stuff like Owen V Bret at WMX, while not ‘rehearsed’, was run on the house show circuit leading up to the PPV so they worked out what wasn’t working and BAM, ***** match. Same thing with Flair/Steamboat, they worked together so often that they could probably do it blindfolded.

However, I do fall into the ‘non-rehearsal’ camp, as a general rule. Not because there’s always a chance an injury could occur, not because training fills this, kinda, and not because you might talk yourself out of a spot or something. No, it comes down to one simple idea.

The fans.

Wrestling is not like a concert or a play in that with those, unless it’s post-modern or improvised, you aren’t reacting to the fans. Yes, you might say a line again if something happens, or when the fans laugh you might leave a longer pause, but there is a very small window for such change. Regardless of how long the gap is, you know what the next line will be.

Professional Wrestling is different in that you are constantly altering and changing the match in order to achieve the most impact and reaction from the fans. If you bodyslam a guy and they boo loud, you might do it again for more boos. Rehearsing a match too much leads to the issue wherein you cannot adjust in mid stream. If the fans aren’t reacting to you working the arm, and you’ve rehearsed a match for months, if you try to adjust and change it up, you’ll both be lost very very quickly (or hell, you might get lost anyway). It’s basically a worse example of the guys who plan out every move in a match. I hate that, mainly because it removes spontaneity, and partly because I can’t remember that much to begin with.

Wrestling is a unique art form, and I feel that it works best when you don’t plan out every detail, let alone rehearse it. Have the major spots, have some ideas, and then, for lack of a better term, ‘wing it’. Rehearsal removes this.

Just my opinion though.

Sam wants to talk race. Well, that’s a safe topic that I’ve never had issues with.

Hi Matt,

Great column, great work, yada yada! I just have a quick question about Mark Henry’s title win at NOC. If my memory serves me properly then Mizark is the first black world champion in years (since Booker last held the belt) – do you think that perhaps this could have had any bearing on the decision to award Henry the belt? Like, do you think Vince thought that it was about time to finally award the belt to another black guy just to, in some way, broaden the demographic of his list of world champions?

Cheers

Maybe in some tiny way, in that I’m sure that ‘he’s a racial minority’ is on the checklist of reasons, but it’s fairly low down the list. I mean, it’s just a side effect of WWE going a lot more global in terms of their employee list, so that they can get more sales of tickets and merch all over the world. When you have a good percentage of the available wrestlers being of some minority or another, be if African-American, African, Japanese, Italian or Hornswoggle, the chances of one of your titles being won by one goes up, unless you’re racist.

But I doubt Vince chose Mark Henry because he’s black. He chose him because he’s big and scary and he’s over now after being pushed as a monster.

Huh, pushing a big scary guy as a monster got someone over. Who would have picked that?

If you would have picked that, let me know below. Until then, later!

NULL

article topics

Mathew Sforcina

Comments are closed.