wrestling / Columns

Ask 411 Wrestling 10.10.12: IYH, WCW, 2nd Gen, More!

October 10, 2012 | Posted by Mathew Sforcina

Welcome to Ask 411 Wrestling, I am your handsome and charming host Mathew Sforcina, and apparently my email link has vanished from this page. Obviously part of the new redesign which is totally awesome and you should totally sign up for it. But clearly some people don’t have my email memorised. Which is fair enough.

So anyway, the email is [email protected] and feel free to bookmark that. Or not, as I’ll be sticking this link up every week now.

What is also each week? Just Another God Damned Rasslin’ Show! And 411mania’s podcasts! Wrestling PodClash is less regular however.

But there is always banner.

411 on Twitter!

Me On Twitter~!
http://www.twitter.com/411mania
http://www.twitter.com/411wrestling
http://www.twitter.com/411moviestv
http://www.twitter.com/411music
http://www.twitter.com/411games
http://www.twitter.com/411mma

Backtalking

Russo, Schiavone and Arquette: I distinctly recall that RF shoot interview with Russo wherein Tony said Arquette should win the title as a joke, he was joking, which then gave Russo the idea, and he called everyone back and then no-one stood up and said “No, this is a very very stupid idea”. So while technically Tony had the idea, it was really all Russo.

Your Turn, Smart Guy…

Who am I? I debuted in the 80’s, and my first major gimmick name was a second attempt, since the first idea I had was too dark. I once beat Jerry Lawler for a title, I once scarred a man, and I also wrestled Steve Austin and Ric Flair in the same match. I was part of the long list of guys who didn’t get along with Eric Bischoff backstage, and Bob Backlund on camera. A man who was once part of a superb match teaming with a future world champion and against two guys who don’t normally have superb matches, I am who?

Rob had it.

Who am I
Scarred a man (Johnny B. Badd)
Wrestled Ric Flair and Steve Austin in the same match (teamed with 2 Cold Scorpio at Battlebowl 1993)
Teamed with a future World Champion (Mick Foley) against two guys who don’t normally have superb matchess (The Nasty Boys)
You are Maxx Payne (AKA Man Mountain Rock)

Who am I? I’m an alumni of CHIKARA, ROH and CZW. I’ve served in the military. I’ve wrestled under a mask at one point, although not for long. I have two daughters, and 4 men who I’ve won tag title gold with. I’ve won a couple of tournaments in my time, although none of them were for title belts. I’ve beaten Chris Hero under European Rules, and in my last match for a major indy company, I lost to the answer to this question from 2 weeks ago. Who am I?

Questions, Questions, Who’s Got The Questions?

We begin with Ron ‘All In’ Gamble once more. Hey, without him I wouldn’t be doing this, so he gets permanent cutsies.

As they say in “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” I’m not dead yet. To prove it, here’s some questions!

It’s time for another question I could probably answer by myself, but I’m too damn lazy to fire up my Google Machine. Besides, if it weren’t for people like me, people like you wouldn’t have an excuse to put up awesome banners every week.

Let’s say Grizzly Smith wants to have a family reunion (I know he’s dead, but work with me), and he wants to invite all his children, their spouses, ex-spouses, etc. Who all gets an invitation?

Well, all his family does.

Ron’s next question is…

Oh, I see.

Well then, that would be…

Jake Roberts, his son, would bring his wife Judy and two ex wives, Karen and Cheryl. Karen would bring three kids (Brandy, Dustin and Derek) and Cheryl would bring her two children (or at least they’d have 5 between them. Some sources disagree over the split.)

Sam Houston, his other son, would bring his ex, Baby Doll and their two daughters, Mikala and Mikka (… Really?).

Rockin’ Robin, as Grizzly’s sole daughter, would only bring some guy called Harvey to whom she was briefly married to in 1990.

That would be the immediate generation down and their immediate relatives. Unless I’ve missed someone, which I’m sure the readers will be all too happy to sign up and tell me so below.

While I’m at it, I’ve heard a rumor (and I’ve confirmed it; it is definitely a rumor) that Ricky Morton gets a Father’s Day card from Kid Cash. Is that true?

No, although I can see where the confusion comes from. When Kash was starting out, Ricky Morton met him and took a shine to the kid, and while Kash continued his training he and Morton formed a team with Kash wrestling as David Tyler Morton Jericho which… Yeah.

Anyway, although the two teamed, and then feuded when they broke up, the two aren’t actually related. DTMJ did last a short while, popping up in ECW and WWF, but after he broke both ankles trying to hurricanrana Scotty 2 Hotty, he took time off and returned as Kid Kash.

Kash may see Morton as a father figure, or maybe there’s some hilarious in-joke that he and Morton share involved a Father’s Day Card (like me and Shazza McKenzie joke about how she only got into the business because of me. Well… I say that and she just laughs at me, but close enough), but they are not actually father and son.

So there you go.

Merwyn has a block of questions which he shouldn’t apologize for.

Hey Massive, hope you don’t mind another block of questions:

1. When Earthquake produced a folded snakeskin and a huge plate of Quakeburgers it was heavily implied that they were the actual product of a squished Damien. To the best of my remembrance there had never been anything mentioned about Jake having his pet’s remains stolen from him. My kayfabe guess is that Jake might’ve disposed of the bag in the dumpster. Living on the road he wouldn’t have a place to bury him, professional cremation is expensive, Jake’s belief may have been that the body’s only a shell. Or perhaps Jake never spoke of the theft, maybe he smoked crack and lost track of his possessions, or maybe Gene Okerlund and WWF News considered the development too disturbing to report to young Hulkamaniacs. Do you have any ideas to contribute on this?

Well, if you re-watch the segment, he doesn’t actually say that the contents of Quakeburgers are actually Damien. Rather, they are merely burgers where Snake is the meat of the dish. So, you don’t need to have a justification for how Earthquake got his hands on the remains of Damien, he just got some snake, as well as some snake skin, and made the suit and the burgers all to just piss Roberts off, to get under his skin, so that Roberts would be upset, which Earthquake wanted, he wanted to hurt Roberts mentally. And also, hey, if Roberts snaps, he’ll get suspended.

But Roberts did sort of address the remains issue. By Paul Bearer talking about it and Roberts just blowing him off.

2. Not even 6 months after Damien’s demise Jake and Earthquake were partners at Survivor Series ’91. There was no bad blood or distrust between the two in their promos and lead-up, plus Earthquake had no fear whatsoever standing next to Jake and his venomous cobra. How can this relationship development be explained, and when did Earthquake get therapy for his phobia? (I might’ve thought his squashing the bag would’ve been a case of him conquering his fear, except there’s at least two instances of him running away from Lucifer after that.)

Yeah, this is the sort of thing that Russo hated and avoided, for the record. How Roberts last match as a face was this…

And then he turns on Warrior…

And then suddenly Roberts and Earthquake are, while not tag partners (Jake didn’t wrestle at Survivor Series 91, the Disasters teamed with IRS) they were friendly. Because all heels are buddies, as are all faces.

Never was a fan of that thinking.

But anyway, the explanation, if required, is that when Roberts turned on Warrior he became, ironically, more trustworthy to the Diasters. They had reason to believe now that Roberts wouldn’t set Lucifer on them, now that he was after Savage and wasn’t trying to win the fans approval. So they had no reason to hate the snake beyond the basic ‘snakes are scary’ issue, which I’m sure was solved by Jimmy Hart taking them out to a reptile park for the day.

Man, why didn’t WWF ever do that, have a Roberts enemy go to a Snake park to get over the fear? They can then walk into the ring, proud that they aren’t scared of Damien or whatever, then kick wham DDT and then Roberts wins. “Never mistake overcoming fear with destroying weakness. For when you focus on one snake, you may not notice another one behind you…”

That would have been so cool…

3. I’ve asked this question before, but either a) it got lost in the ether, b) was dismissed as being a joke, c) was answered for someone else years ago and I missed it, or d) it’s still on the waiting list and I’m impatient. For the three storylines I know of where the heel kills the face’s beloved pet (Earthquake squashing Damien, Candido squashing Boots, and Bossman making Pepper steak fajitas) there was never a satisfactory conclusion for the face. (In fact, Bossman got the last laugh when he pissed on the dog’s grave.) However, in a very morbid coincidence, all three heels ended up passing away at a young age. Since I’ve heard that some wrestlers are superstitious, do you think Chris Jericho thanks his lucky stars every day that Lucy survived her pre-Wrestlemania 18 accident?

No, because while most wrestlers are indeed superstitious, they are also damn good at finding loopholes. And in this case, Jericho has a big one. Earthquake meant to squash Damien. Candido meant to end one of Boots’ lives. And it’s kinda hard to imagine how Bossman could accidentally turn Pepper into Mexican food. But if Jericho had indeed killed Lucy, since it was an accident, it wouldn’t have mattered, he didn’t fit the pattern.

(Although if he’d killed Lucy and then retained the Undisputed title at Wrestlemania, then he might well have begun to panic.

4. How is it, in kayfabe, that Jake’s DDTs and Earthquake’s Quake Splashes originally sent wrestlers to the hospital but later on merely secured a win without injuring their opponent too severely?

Thanks!

Because when Jake and Earthquake were doing that, they were facing scrubs, they were fighting guys who weren’t upper class WWF superstars, and thus they were weaker gentlemen. That’s why they kept losing, their talents and ability to withstand pain was lesser than those higher class of superstar they would face later on. And of course, by then, enough people have taken the move such that, as part of the brotherhood, word has gotten around, people have compared notes, and now people have ideas, that if you breath out when Quake hits, or if you try and get your hands down, you can lessen the impact.

So basically a higher class of athlete, with more time to prepare and train, leads to a move becoming less impactful. I mean, hell, today a DDT is barely a 2 count unless it’s added to somehow, people know how to absorb the punishment. Unless Jake Roberts gives it, because nothing quite prepares you for the original…

Mike F has a few questions, starting with more logic. Hey, that’s what I’m good at.

Evening Mr Sforcina, thought I would rattle off a couple of questions that have been rolling around in my head before you inevitably announce your decision to set off on your future endeavours.

Hmm. I dunno, the thought has occurred to me, my first Ask 411 Wrestling was Christmas Eve, 2008. Boxing Day, 2012… It’s somewhat fitting…

1/ I have been watching a lot of 90s Michinoku Pro recently and there is one move I can’t get the “wrestling logic” off. Wrestler A falls to the outside of the ring for whatever reason, Wrestler B jumps to the top turnbuckle or rope but instead of delivering the expected top rope splash, moonsault or whatever they back-flip into the ring, pose and then generally make the “I’m smarter than you” point to the head sign. What’s the logic here? How is not delivering a high impact, potentially decisive move to your opponent a good thing.

Freaking your opponent out, making him second guess himself, not stupidly going for a high risk move this early, playing it cool while showing that you’re better than your opponent and can beat him any time you want… Take your pick really. Depends on the guy. I think the ‘I could jump off and crush you, but I don’t need to because I’m just that good’ reason is the basic, generic one. I am just gonna get a pop from the crowd rather than attack you because I’m just that good. But it could mean anything you want it to.

2 / What is the off-screen and on screen history of the Kliq? How did the originally 3 key members of come to be friends backstage, how did the other members get involved and how was this mirrored by the on screen referral to Shawn’s fans as being the Kliq?

OK, go from the end to the front: The Kliq as the name for HBK’s fans, that came about because Russo suggested it as a ‘clever’ inside reference that HBK didn’t like and that never really got over.

As for the history of the group… There’s a lot of misinformation, and different ideas and stories. But basically, it goes something like this. Starting backstage, Michaels, Razor and The Kid were all in WWF at the same time. Michaels was rising up the card, Razor and Kid were solid midcard acts. All 3 would enjoy the night life, all had egos, but they all found each other good company, and so they formed a friendship, and were buddies. And then Michaels, looking for a way to further his career, turned on WCW and saw Vinnie Vegas. He reached out to Nash, and Nash then got out of his WCW contract, claiming he was quitting the business, then debuted a week later as Diesel.

Nash and Michaels quickly became friends, and the 4 of them formed a tight group. They never called themselves anything, they were just buddies. But as the group rose in power, with their on screen stock rising and with it more say backstage, others began to refer to them as a group, with Lex Luger, apparently, naming them the Clique.

Eventually Triple H would join the company and… OK, this is where one could be accused of bias, but the thing is, the 4 other guys were all party animals who hung out with each other because they were all cool guys, and then they’d also make sure they were looked after in the ring. Hunter was not a party animal, he didn’t do drugs or the like. So, you’re left with the idea that Hunter only hung out with them, at first, for the power thing, for the social climbing. But then he became very close later on, both in the group and then becoming Shawn’s best buddy.

Of course, you can just as easily say that if you’re entering a new social setting, you would look for a group to latch onto so as to fit in quicker. So maybe it wasn’t power climbing.

*cough*

But anyway, the five hung out and were buddies and all looked after each other and then Nash and Hall went to leave for WCW and… The Curtain Call.

And then the group basically stayed together behind the scenes, and the onscreen stuff begins to intertwine and become mixed. And the group had hangers on and offsiders, like Credible and Spicolli and the like. Guys would be mentored by members of the group and thus get peripheral membership, or would travel with members, or would screw members…

On air… The group never really was ever aligned, 5 strong. They’d always be feuding or something. But then after Curtain Call the thing keeps getting brought up, from the subtle (the Wolfpac symbol and the crotch chops) to the direct (The Band). They’d never really be united as a team. Unless you’re asking for a total history of the 5 men’s interaction on screen.

Are you? Let me know, and if so, I’ll do it next week.

3 / Tatanka’s initial WWF run was famous for his undefeated streak that came to nothing and then his less than stellar heel turn against Luger. Why did nothing come of this initial push? From memory he did work a short program against Shawn for the IC title but it came to nothing. Why did his heel turn run out of steam and he ultimate vanish into indie obscurity for a number of years until his comeback?

As always, thanks for your insight and wisdom

The heel turn failed because he didn’t differentiate himself post heel turn. He should have become Chris Chavis, turned his back on his heritage, or become something other than just Tatanka, but EVIL~! it might have done better. He sorta half did it, but not really, not full bore, which he should have.

As for the first run, it did what it was supposed to, which was to establish him as a solid mid card face. Not every push is designed to make a main event star. Sure, if it happens that’s awesome, but Tatanka was meant to be solid upper-mid. He did work a program with Shawn, although his highest point was actually post loss, when he worked a surprisingly strong drawing run against Yokozuna at house shows for the title.

So yeah, his push did get him over. Maybe not as over as he could have, but it did its job.

Time constraints on the words = Video A Go Go!

First, some vaudeville!

And now some advertising (although hopefully my tweet made it in)!

Problem with watching things from a skybox is that you don’t make the video.

And here’s a cool old match!

And some Art0donnell!


Mikeal is next.

Good column, I enjoy the weekly read. First time asking a question:

1) Previously in this column you had mentioned the following, “Jericho had a lot of momentum with him from WCW where he could wrestle a WCW style match……….. But when he got to WWF, he couldn’t work a WWF style match to save his life………”

I started to watch wrestling just prior to the Attitude Era and never…ever… thought about watching WCW, as I generally just was not interested. As a result I can’t compare what a WCW worked match was like in comparison to a WWF styled match looked like. Could you explain what are the differences between a WWF and a WCW styled match?

Well the terms mean something different now, or at least WWE does, but at the time, WWF and WCW had a different in ring style that was quite noticeable. Or at least, the general idea, each company had different styles. A Mysterio/Malenko match was different to a Nasty Boys/Anyone match, after all.

But generally when Jericho came over, he was used to wrestling in WCW, where you worked chain, you… Well, you wrestled. You swapped holds, you focused on body parts, you told a story in the ring, and you by gun wrestled!

Whereas when Jericho debuted in WWF, in 1999, Austin had already sent the WWF style into a totally different path. WWF was already more of a big move company, you did less chain and more big moves, but then Austin both got incredibly over and then broke his neck. So when Jericho came in, the WWF was now much closer to ECW, in a way. You would trade blows, maybe use weapons, up until really big moves. The so called ‘punch kick finisher’ style of match. And Jericho wasn’t really good at that, and so he wasn’t able to slot into the main event right away, despite the crowd reaction.

It wasn’t until 2000, when guys like Benoit and Angle came in and got pushed that Jericho was able to start having great matches that were closer to WCW matches, and sort of glide into adjusting his style and adjusting the WWF’s overall style. Which leads to the next question…

2) Since the WCW buy out, and other WCW wrestlers joined the WWE, I would assume that not only did these WCW guys have to adjust their style, but also elements of a WCW styled match then gelled with the WWE style and the WWE style evolved into what we see present day match. What general elements of a WCW style match are still present today in the current style of the WWE?

Thanks,

Actually, the WCW style didn’t really come in with the Invasion. The WCW guys were meant to learn to work WWF style, which is part of the problem right there. WCW and ECW guys should have wrestled in those styles, to differentiate themselves (there’s that word again…), but whatever.

It sort of crept in via both the 2000 ‘real wrestlers’ influx and, more recently, efforts to retrain the fans and, in the future, Triple H taking over. See, now guys do work chain, they trade holds, not as much as WCW sure, but it’s a lot more than Attitude era. You don’t see punch kick finisher any more, now guys will work a body part and be a bit more focused and show some moves and what have you. That’s really the influence of the old school NWA and WCW, WWE has, while not totally reverting, trained the audience to accept chain and less flashy moves. Now Rey Mysterio and Sin Cara doing a couple flips a match is incredible, as opposed to the 20 or so they’d have done in the first hour of a Nitro in 98.

Joshua thinks that the IWC think tank might be wrong.

So I’ve read 100 times on the Internet that the reason men like Shawn Michaels and Bret Hart became WWE champion was because Vince had to get away from the Big Men Champion due to the fact that he was facing steroid allegations. But something about this doesn’t sit right with me. Vince had smaller champions before the hearings.

Bob Backlund was no Ryback when he was champion for 6 years
Randy Savage wasn’t as big as Hogan, I mean physically
Ted Dibiase, although wasn’t WWE champion was at one point penciled in. He’s not a big guy.
Ric Flair was WWE Champion in 1992 and he’s not some giant meat head.
Bret Hart won the WWE title in 1992 which was 2 years before McMahon went on trial

So there’s a few examples of smaller guys winning the WWE title before the 1994 trail. So the idea that Vince only put the belt on smaller guys due to the trial isn’t a true statement. Do you agree?

I think you’re mistaking ‘put belt on’ and ‘push’ here. Plus you’re also mistaking height for size.

The point about Vince McMahon is that he defaults to large muscular guys. Given a choice, he’ll push a guy who is tall and muscular over a guy who isn’t. But that doesn’t mean he won’t push a smaller guy, just that he prefers bigger guys. And it’s not so much just about who is the champ, it’s about who is on the undercard. Vince will have more musclebound stiffs on the undercard if he can. But if he can’t, then fine, smaller guys will do.

As for your examples, each guy got the belt (or would have) despite not being huge, not because they weren’t. Backlund was a clean cut babyface who could draw in a big way in blow off matches. Savage was over as hell and was still very muscular, just because he wasn’t tall doesn’t mean he wasn’t big in Vince’s eyes. DiBiase was VERY over. Flair was… Flair, and also he got a little sick about the whole World Title thing. And Hart was a push against old.

But again, the idea that Vince only pushed smaller guys due to the steroid trials is, while not fact (none of us knows what Vince thinks), it is somewhat undeniable, if you look at the overall roster pre and post. Several large, muscular bodies suddenly vanished, replaced by not quite as muscular and large wrestlers. Hart and Michaels getting the title was just a side effect of the company moving away from the chemical bodies. So while saying they got the title only because of the trials isn’t technical accurate, the overall idea of what the statement is saying is. Vince did move away from steroid looking bodies because of the trial. And with that, came non-steroid bodies holding the title.

Name Redacted asks one of those questions I can’t answer with any authority.

Good evening Mr. Sforcina,

My question is on the WWF “Brahma Bull” Championship belt. I have read different stories about it online about how it never really existed and was made only as a toy. I went to the WWE Championship Wiki Page and it says, and I quote, (Shout out to the anonymous RAW GM and Michael Cole) “A custom championship belt was designed and constructed for The Rock which featured his trademark Brahma Bull logo in the center, but it was lost and thus, never appeared on television.”. So, I continued to do research and read that it actually wasn’t lost, but Rock didn’t want to bury the WWF Big Eagle Belt and that’s why it was never seen on television. I would like some more clearance on this matter if you could help me out. Thanks again and keep up the good work.

Well, there’s a lot of conflicting information, most of which basically boils down to what you said. Either the belt was lost in transit at the time, and they moved on, or, and I’ll admit this is the side I lean on, after they made the title it was decided that if they started having special belts made for every single superstar Winged Eagle would no longer matter. So they decided to drop the idea and, maybe, come up with a ‘oh, it got lost in transit’ story to cover.

Rock has said creative differences, he quite possibly felt it sucked. So I tend to buy that general argument more than the lost in transit. But I found no other information. Readers?

Rage asks a simple question.

Hey man long time, first time. I’m a Stone Cold Steve Austin fanatic. In all of his matches, there’s always a spot where he and his opponent goes outside the ring and Austin manages to be in a position where he would powerbomb/piledrive his opponent but it always backfires, that is, he always gets back-body dropped. Was there ever a time when Austin successfully powerbombed or piledrived his opponent to the concrete floor? Thanks man!

I know one off the very top of my head, although it was late in his run. Kurt Angle in 01.

Beyond that, however, I don’t think he every hit it with any regularity. Like guys trying a powerbomb on Kidman, the move was there to be countered. But if anyone else knows, please do illuminate me.

My Damn Opinion

Oz asks about multiple generations. (And Kurt Angle’s music, but we covered that.)

Hey Matt,

I have another question for you. I’ve noticed the WWE has been signing alot of 2nd and 3rd generation wrestlers kids ( Richie Steamboat, Joe Henning, Shaul Guerrerro, Reed Flair, etc). Do you see alot of these kids being able to step out of the shadow of their parents?

I think it depends on the wrestler. WWE seems to have this yes and no reaction to second and third gen guys, they love them and sign them up, but then often they don’t refer to their parentage.

See, up until recently, WWE seemed to be working on this somewhat bizarre logic that second and third gen guys who aren’t trained must be good, and if we sign them up green, we can train them fully in WWE style. Because sure, while 2 of the biggest stars they have right now are indy veterans, they still prefer guys who just wrestle the WWE “Slow Walk, Work the Camera” ideal.

But then they don’t refer to their history, they don’t tend to bring it up. Some guys they do, but Bo Dallas is, well, Bo Dallas, as opposed to Tank Rotunda or anything. For every Richie Steamboat there’s several Michael McGillicuttys.

So really, it comes down to the talent of the wrestler. They aren’t in the shadow of their parentage unless they fail. If they fail, they don’t break free, if they make it, then they make it. I suppose there is some twisted logic there…

How should the WWE build them, so they don’t crash and burn under the weight of their family’s legacy?

Cheers

OK, to be clear, I’m not demanding that every second or third gen star should be a family prodigy angle. It’s just that they shouldn’t be totally cut off, unless that’s gimmick, the self made man idea.

See, there is no hard and fast rule, no universal way to do it. Every wrestler is different and should be pushed differently. Some guys you will do a straight “I just wanna live up to my Dad’s name” angle (Steamboat), while others can do a “They say that I’m his Son, well I’m gonna make people see that really, he’s just my father!” angle (The Rotunda boys) and others, it’s just a factoid, a side note to their main gimmick (The Colons). Every wrestler is different, and you can’t assume they’ll all be able to use the same gameplan.

But yes, I would tend to bring up the lineage more than I wouldn’t. There would need to be a reason, a gimmick or something to make me not bring up the generational thing. We can’t do a Legacy rehash just yet, but just acknowledge it, and if the fans react, you can go with it. If not, then move on.

Matt finishes us off with a doozy of a question.

What would be your match listing for a two or three disc of the best of “in your house” ppv matches?

Oooh. OK, counting only those shows that had IYH in the title, there’s 28 or so. You could, theoretically, do a match per show, since that’s about as many matches as a 3 disc set holds. By that logic…

IYH1: Hakushi V Bret Hart
IYH2: Jeff Jarrett (C) V Shawn Michaels, IC Title
IYH3: Diesel (C)/Shawn Michaels (C) V Yokozuna/Owen HartBritish Bulldog (C) WWF/IC/Tag Title Match.
IYH4: Goldust V Marty Jannetty
IYH5: Hunter Hearst Helmsley V Henry O Godwinn, Arkansas Hog Pen Match
IYH6: Shawn Michaels V Owen Hart, #1 Contender’s match
IYH7: Shawn Michaels (C) V Diesel, WWF Title
IYH8: Savio Vega V Steve Austin, Caribbean Strap Match (Night 2)
IYH9: Camp Cornette V The People’s Posse
IYH10: Shawn Michaels (C) V Mankind, WWF Title
IYH11: Steve Austin V Hunter Hearst Helmsley
IYH12: Leif Cassidy V Flash Funk
IYH13: Bret Hart V Steve Austin V Vader V Undertaker, WWF Title
IYH14: Bret Hart V Steve Austin
IYH15: Vader V Ken Shamrock
IYH16: The Hart Foundation V Austin/Shamrock/Goldust/LOD
IYH17: Shawn Michaels V The Undertaker
IYH18: Shawn Michaels V The Undertaker, Hell In A Cell
IYH19: Triple H V Sgt. Slaughter, Bootcamp Match
IYH20: Austin/Hart/Jack/Charlie V HHH/Vega/NAO
IYH21: Steve Austin (C) V Dude Love, WWF Title
IYH22: Steve Austin (C) V Dude Love, WWF Title
IYH23: Val Venis V Jeff Jarrett
IYH24: The Rock V Mankind V Ken Shamrock, #1 Contender’s Cage Match.
IYH25: Ken Shamrock (C) V Mankind, IC Title
IYH26: Goldust V Jeff Jarrett, Strip Tease match
IYH27: Kane & Chyna V Triple H & X-Pac
IYH28: Steve Austin (C) V The Rock, WWF Title.

However, if I was to be allowed to include more than one and skip a few…

Hakushi/Bret from IYH1 (First ever IYH match)
Roadie/123 Kid from IYH2 (Second Rope Piledriver!)
Michaels/Jarrett from IYH2 (Great Great Match)
Diesel/HBK/Yoko/Bulldog (The stips were pretty big)
HBK/Owen from IYH6 (Lost classic)
HBK/Diesel from IYH7 (Great match, albeit one that’s somewhat used)
HBK/Mankind from IYH10 (Yes, this match is on like every second DVD. But it hasn’t been on one recently, and it is one of the best matches in IYH ever, so it gets in)
Cassidy/Funk from IYH12 (This is very good, another lost classic)
Hart/Austin/Taker/Vader from IYH13 (Hey, who doesn’t love the Final Four match?)
Mankind/HHH from IYH16
Sasuke/TAKA from IYH16
Taker/Vader from IYH16
Harts/Everyone from IYH16 (Seriously, I would include the entire main PPV. Every match was superb.)
HBK/Taker from IYH17/18 (I’d drop 17 if there was time constraints, but you have to include Hell in a Cell)
Austin/Hart/Jack/Charlie/HHH/Vega/NAO (Anything goes! Chyna getting Stunned!)
Austin/Dude from IYH21/22 (Again, drop 21 if need be, but you have to include the Rule Changing match)
Rock/Mankind/Shamrock from IYH24 (Yet another classic with little love)
Chyna/Kane/HHH/X-Pac from IYH27 (I love that match, so sue me)
Austin/Rock from IYH28 (Final ever IYH match. Damn good one too.)

That’s my second list. 21 is about right. Toss in a few openings (St Valentines and Over The Edge mainly) and we’re golden. What about you guys? Give your opinion below, and we’ll contrast and compare next week. Until then, sleep well. I know I will.

NULL

article topics

Mathew Sforcina

Comments are closed.