wrestling / Columns

WWE vs. TNA 1.13.07: William Regal vs. Nigel McGuinness

January 13, 2007 | Posted by Jordan Linkous

The Pre-Match Warm-up:

Hello and welcome to WWE vs. TNA. I am your loyal host Jordan Linkous. Last week I brought you my Year End Awards. I hope you enjoyed them. I try to watch wrestling as often as I can, but unfortunately that isn’t very often. I did, however, catch New Years Revolution, so here are my thoughts.

Jeff Hardy vs. Johnny Nitro
This was a great match, no doubt. However, it didn’t seem to “flow” as much as I thought it should have. I’m not saying it was a total spotfest, but it was a bit spotty in parts. Good match though.

Tag Team Turmoil
Pretty standard match with the right team winning. I always seem to like these matches though, but once Cryme Tyme won I knew the result to the RKO/DX match.

Kenny Dykstra vs. Ric Flair
TV match on a PPV. Next.

Victoria vs. Mickie James
I was under whelmed by this match. I went into it thinking it was going to be a great match, but alas, it was nothing special. And I really thought Victoria should have gone over.

DX vs. Rated RKO
I actually enjoyed this match. It was a decent brawl, but took a bad turn when Triple H ruined his leg. Let’s see what happens for HBK now. I would love to see CM Punk come over and take HHH’s place, but I don’t see that happening. I hope that he has a speedy recovery, though.

Carlito vs. Chris Masters
BOOOOOO! THIS MATCH SUCKED!

John Cena vs. Umaga
Going into this match, I really thought it would be bad. I didn’t like Umaga either, but I can’t lie, he impressed me. These guys have some good chemistry and I wouldn’t mind seeing a rematch.

Well that was fun. Now onto the WWE vs. TNA!

William Regal vs. Nigel McGuiness

Category 1: Strengths

JL: William Regal: Beloved by the IWC, Regal is an old-school technical wrestler. He puts on great matches, and is a good example for the new guys. He started out wrestling in Blackpool, England at the carnivals when he was fifteen. He then went to WCW, and then got called up to WWE. That went flat and he checked himself into rehab. He went back to WWE then after they saw him wrestle Chris Benoit at the Brian Pillman Memorial show. He is a no-nonsense wrestler and has been a key player in King Booker’s Royal Court. He has a vast knowledge of wrestling holds, and has a lot of experience as a tag team wrestler. Let’s look at a few of the things that make William Regal such a fine wrestler. First and foremost is his technical wrestling. He is very scientific, and can use his knowledge to wear his opponents down. He targets an opponents week points and is relentless in breaking then down. He is a stiff competitor and often weakens his opponents with a series of knee strikes and European Uppercuts. He has been known to put a few opponents down for the count with his running knee strike as well. Aside from his technical skills, he is a well accomplished grappler. In his arsenal of moves lie a series of devastating suplexes and brutal neck breakers. He uses such suplexes as the Exploder, Double Underhook Suplex, and Half Nelson Suplex. He executes these moves with a certain precision that puts his opponents in much pain. He also uses the Regal Cutter, which is essentially an arm trap neck breaker. Aside from his true wrestling skills, Regal is also a cunning opponent in the sense that the Southpaw will put you down with a swift punch to the head using the brass knuckles. Nevertheless, William Regal is a keen opponent that is well trained in technical wrestling, brawling, grappling and cheating. If Regal was to meet up with Nigel, I think he should use his slow, methodical technique to wear him down, and then take advantage of them with a submission move.

SB: Nigel McGuinness: Nigel’s biggest strengths are three-fold. First of all, he’s a consummate technical wrestler. Though his offense is focused more in the European-style catch-as-catch-can techniques, McGuinness has mixed it up with some of North America’s top technical wrestlers and held his own using a fusion of his European offense with more traditionally American methods. One need not look further than his series of matches against “American Dragon” Bryan Danielson to see that even against stiff technical competition, Nigel has more than held his own, if not dominated. Speaking of stiff, the second of Nigel’s strengths is the impact with which much of his offense connects. Nigel has a variety of hard strikes that help cause large amounts of damage with an economy of motion. For example, one combination that he often puts to use is placing an opponent in a tree-of-woe position and then hitting a stiff kick to the back and a downwards elbow strike in quick succession. Nigel’s third major strength is his in-ring intelligence. During his nearly year-long stranglehold on the ROH Pure Championship, Nigel repeatedly defeated opponents by disqualification or countout to retain his title. Rather than feeling the need to “prove” anything by pinning his opponent or forcing a submission, Nigel showed that what was important in the long-term was holding onto his belt. During his title vs. title match against Danielson, Nigel even showed a willingness to give up a chance winning the Ring of Honor World Title if it meant retaining the Pure Title, and thus he scored a countout victory in the matchup. McGuinness has also showed an uncanny understanding (honorable or not) of when to utilize an illegal maneuver to his advantage. While a lot of wrestlers cheat openly and hope to not get disqualified, Nigel is a master at causing a distraction and then picking his spot to take advantage of some moments of free reign. For example, rarely did a Pure Title defense go by that Nigel didn’t get in a closed fist to the face, a move specifically prohibited under Pure Wrestling Rules.

Category 2: Fighting Styles

SB: Nigel McGuinness: As stated above, Nigel’s primary offense is a mixture of European and American technical wrestling. Working in a variety of joint locks, Nigel can wear down an opponent by focusing on a single body part, and utilizing both complicated and simple moves. The most impressive part about this style of wrestling is that not only can it lead to a submission victory, but also it often affects his opponent’s ability to cleanly hit their own maneuvers. Most commonly, Nigel works the arm with moves such as a Hammerlock Pedigree or a wristlock takedown. He often follows those up with simple submission holds like a seated armbar or a resting hammerlock to continue to cause damage. Occasionally, when running into an opponent who is similarly technically proficient, Nigel has found more success focusing his offense in hard strikes. Stiff slaps, chops, kicks and elbows have all been major parts of Nigel’s arsenal during his career. European uppercuts and other solid forearms are a staple of McGuinness’ offense, and because of Nigel’s substantial size and toughness, he is able to trade them equally with even the most hardened of competition. Also, Nigel is great at adapting to and reversing an opponent’s attack. A great example of a traditional McGuinness counter is to go to a turnbuckle headstand on a cross-corner whip and then hit a stiff double boot to the face as his opponent runs in on a blind charge. Or, you know, if none of that works, he could just cheat. That’s always worked, too.

JL: William Regal: As I previously stated, William Regal is a brawler and a technical wrestler. His years of experience in WWE and WCW have led him to acquire a vast knowledge of the wrestling world, and his fighting style greatly reflects that. His blunt style of wrestling has earned him much respect, and there is little to argue against it. Each blow he lays on his opponent is an excruciating ordeal, and he severely weakens his opponents with his arsenal of strikes. Along with the strikes, his grappling style shows, as he takes his opponents down with arm drags, headlocks, and as mentioned earlier, his agonizing suplexes. However, his main style is the technical. He is a scientific wrestler, and his experience leads to his wide array of submission moves, each painful to the human body. Whether it is as simple as a headlock of an armbar, or as complex as the Regal Stretch, each move leaves his opponents sore and aching. Apart from that, there always seems to be a method to his madness. Instead of using moves that have no effect together, such as a dropkick followed by a knee breaker, his moves make sense. He targets a body part and works it over. He follows up his moves in a way that makes sense, not just thrown out in a random fashion. Not only that, but he seems to keep his opponents off of their feet and guessing. Again, this is thanks to his fighting styles. He could drop you with a knee to the head then follow up with a dragon sleeper, or hit a clothesline then a butterfly Suplex. Needless to say, William Regal’s fighting techniques lay way to his vast success as his can always keep his opponents guessing which type of predicament they will find themselves in with Sir William Regal.

Category 3: Finishers

JL: William Regal: Throughout William Regal’s career, he has mainly used three different finishing maneuvers. First of is the Regal Stretch. It is an STF which sees Regal trap the opponents arm and lock the leg. Many have fallen prey to this submission hold, but that isn’t the only move he uses. Not technically a finisher, the Power of the Punch has been used on several occasions to win the match. It is a left jab while wearing the brass knuckles. Simple. Painful. Effective. The move he has been using recently is the Running Knee Strike. While his opponent is keeled over in pain, Regal rebounds off the ropes and drives his knee into the head of his opponent. No matter which move Regal hits on Nigel, it will deal a large amount of pain and possible end the match.

SB: Nigel McGuinness: One of Nigel’s best attributes is that he has a variety of ways that he can realistically win a match. Recently, he’s been using the Pendulum Lariat to finish off a number of opponents. When whipped to the ropes, Nigel will lean back with the momentum and then rebound back into the ring before hitting a hard lariat to the head or chest of his opposition. Another major weapon that Nigel has put to use is the Tower of London. With an opponent’s feet draped over the top rope in one of the corners, Nigel hits a falling Ace Crusher, often pushing down on his victim’s head right before impact. The result is a violent and swift collision of the competitor’s head and chest with the ring. When used during Pure Title matches, the fact that an opponent would naturally be close to the ropes posed little problem, as there are a limited number of rope breaks allowed in such a match. However, the Tower of London is obviously somewhat less effective during a more traditional matchup because Nigel has to drag his opponent away from the ropes after hitting the move before an effective cover can be made. If NEITHER of those moves were to work, then Nigel could go to the Thames Barrier, which is a wristlock variation that he has used to gain submission victories over the years. Though not a primary weapon in recent months, it remains a valuable part of Nigel’s battery.

The Final Result:

If I had to pick, I’d say that Regal could probably pull out a win against McGuinness on experience alone. But it’s hard to count out some of Nigel’s intangibles. If nothing else, bear in mind that Nigel is one of only two men to hold multiple singles victories over Samoa Joe in Ring of Honor (Austin Aries is the other). I’m not saying there’s a direct link between beating Joe and beating William Regal, but Nigel has clearly clashed with (and defeated) some of the best in the world. Though it might be considered a minor upset, I wouldn’t be particularly surprised if I saw Nigel get a win over Regal. Hell, he’d probably be satisfied if it was by countout.

Who would win in a classic singles match ?
William Regal
Nigel McGuinness
  
pollcode.com free polls

FEEDBACK:

I have feedback from my Year End Awards, and also some other stuff mixed in there.

great year end awards, i agreed with almost all of your choices, especially mickie james as women’s wrestler of the year. she’s a great wrestler, she’s hot, and she had a great feud with trish stratus. anyone who can come in as an unknown and in a couple months make the fans cheer her more than the most popular diva in years deserves some recognition.

i’ve been reading this site for quite a while and am a huge tna fan, and i’ve come to the assumption that i must be the only person that likes vkm. i find the skits and promos funny for the most part, and i love the fact that they are using hhh and hbk’s real names. i totally disagree with the notion that they are “promoting” wwe by doing these skits. everyone who watches tna knows about the wwe, i bet the majority of tna’s fans watch them both, and i’m sure there are a growing number like myself who are so sick of wwe right now that tna is the only wrestling show they watch on a constant basis. i’ve checked the ratings every week and wwe isn’t going up at all thanks to the vkm promos. i think what tna is trying to do with vkm is pretty smart… it’s called trying to get the wwe so pissed off that they acknowledge tna somewhere, either on the air or on the website or even on an interview or press release, so then tna could get some more promotion for themselves. until that happens there is no harm in having a running joke about wwe, i would consider raw as a two hour running joke anyway. and for the argument that tna only gets an hour so they should be doing something more productive with their time, a vkm promo is at the most a minute or two, and i for one would rather see a promo than a squash match. the loyal tna viewers know who’s good, who’s not, and who’s getting a push we don’t need any more 60 second squash matches.

and you forgot an award: hottest diva… 1. maria 2. mickie james 3. michelle mccool (in the schoolgirl outfit)

adam
fall river, ma

Good points Adam. But the promos aren’t making WWE mad so far, so therefore I see no point in them. But for the most part, you’re right. I guess I’m just kind of tired with it. Or maybe I’m not so mad at VKM as i am at Vince Russo. Ehh.

Also, a few people caught my blunder about Finlay last week. I accidentally said Finlay was from Finland, probably because I was tired and FIN-lay sounds like FIN-land. These people were: Bosstone727 and PMA.

STUART CARAPOLA! tries to make things a little simpler in regard to the Punk/Angle matchup:

Hey Jordan,

Just thought I’d throw in a little bit more insight into a couple of the
finishing moves you described for the Punk-Angle matchup. With the Anaconda
Vice, I think a less complicated description would be a side
headlock/hammerlock combination. What actually makes the hold effective is
that Punk lifts his hips off the ground and arches backward, putting all his
weight on the opponent. This gives him a combined effect of both making it
harder for the opponent to breathe while also giving him more leverage to
crank up on the neck and arm. If applied properly, it’s actually a pretty
nasty hold to be in. It just looks like a headlock to most fans, though.

As for the Angle Slam, it’s simply a modified fireman’s carry, except he
lifts from the outside leg instead of the inside leg. It’s actually a move
used in the amateurs, I believe I’ve heard it referred to by some as the
Milkshake. What Angle has done with the move, though, is arch so far back
when delivering the move that it almost becomes a Saito suplex, except that
since he’s lifting from the base instead of the waist, the opponent can be
turned even farther upside down and also has his center of gravity coming
down on top of him instead of just being dumped on his head with a regular
Saito suplex.

Hope that helps. I really liked this week’s matchup.

Stuart

Isn’t Stuart awesome? Here’s one from the vault as John B. (Not John Bryant, I think) talks about the Benoit/Danielson match.

Hey Jordan,

Thoroughly enjoying your WWE vs. TNA/ROH column, keep up the good work.

Now I’m actually writing to let you know why I personally voted for Chris Benoit to beat Bryan Danielson – it’s nothing to do with the actual abilities of the two, but if Benoit faced Danielson ANYWHERE in the wrestling world in a one off match (the key point being that they only wrestle once), including ROH, then I’ve got to think Benoit would walk out the winner 9 times out of 10.

Why?

Well Bryan Danielson is currently where Benoit was ten years ago. Yes I’ve seen his matches in ROH, and yes I’ve been thoroughly impressed with him, I’m aware of who he is and some of his matches are stone cold classics. No doubt about it, at this stage in both wrestlers’ careers, Danielson is putting on better matches more frequently than Benoit. But Benoit is a veteran who’s seen and done it all, all over the world. He’s ranked as one of the top, top wrestlers in the world, working for THE top promotion in the United States, and maybe the world.

It simply wouldn’t be right to put Danielson over Benoit until Danielson has forged anything like the legacy The Crippler has – and to do that, he’s got to drop ROH, join TNA or WWE and find his niche in the real media spotlights.

Benoit is a proven top-level player – Danielson simply has the potential to be so. A hell of a lot of potential, sure, and I don’t know too many people that don’t believe he’d cut it in TNA or WWE, but it’s all by-the-by. Danielson hasn’t done it, and he isn’t the star, nay, the uber-experienced wrestler, that Benoit is.

It’d be a match for the ages, but I can’t see it going any other way than Benoit picking up the win with an inventive roll-up out of nowhere to teach Danielson that extra move that he’s picked up.

By the way, on a similar note, I voted Angle to beat Punk for similar reasons đŸ˜‰

Keep up the good work, mate.
John B.

He makes some good points, but I think Danielson IS a proven top level player, and I DO think he would make it in WWE or TNA.

I think that pretty much wraps up the column this week. Special thanks to Samuel Berman for the help. Don’t forget to check out his column, the Independent Mid-Card. Take a look at Part 1 and Part 2 of Delirious vs. Matt Sydal. Take a look at the other columns, too. I’m out. Peace.

NULL

article topics

Jordan Linkous

Comments are closed.